The Presidency

Since 1933, when the Twentieth Amendment to the Constitution moved up the date of the President’s inauguration from March 4 to January 20, new Presidents-elect have had about eleven weeks to make the transition from candidate to President. Several important tasks must be accomplished in this period if the transition is to be successful. None is politically more important than appointing the White House staff and the cabinet. None is personally more important than preparing the new President’s family for life in the White House.

Like Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933 and Ronald Reagan in 1981, Obama had to address a major economic crisis as soon as he was inaugurated on January 20, 2009. The nation’s leading banks and other financial institutions were in serious danger of collapse. The economy had stopped growing and was hemorrhaging jobs, with the unemployment rate nearing 10 percent. Housing prices were in free-fall, leading to numerous foreclosures.

Image 

Even before taking the oath of office, Obama had endorsed President George W. Bush’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), a $700-billion initiative to rescue the nation’s major banks by lending enough money to keep them solvent. As President, Obama also directed some TARP funds to General Motors and Chrysler in an effort to keep the automobile industry from going bankrupt. TARP worked—all the banks and auto companies survived and by the end of 2009 they already had repaid the government more than $600 billion—but many voters perceived the program as a bailout for wealthy bankers and corporate executives.

 Image

Obama’s first major recommendation to Congress was for an $800-billion economic stimulus package: the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. About one-third of the money involved grants to state governments to keep them from laying off public employees or reducing unemployment compensation; about one-third went for bridges, highways, sewage treatment facilities, and other infrastructure projects; and the remaining third was for middle-class tax cuts. Although Obama hoped to pass the Recovery Act with bipartisan support, not a single Republican House member and only three Republican senators voted for it. Democratic control of Congress was strong enough to secure its passage, however, and President Obama signed the act into law on February 17, 2009.

Obama wanted to do more as President than put out fires. He also sought to enact a major reform of the nation’s health care system. Health care reform had been a leading Democratic Party goal since the presidency of Harry S. Truman. In 1965, Lyndon B. Johnson had secured the enactment of Medicare for older Americans and Medicaid for the poor. The next two Democratic Presidents, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, each failed to persuade Congress to pass legislation to guarantee health care coverage for everyone else. Although Obama had only promised during the election campaign to address this issue “by the end of my four-year term,” he decided that his best chance of success was during his first year in office, when his popularity was likely to be at its highest.

Obama faced major hurdles in achieving health care legislation. Although Democrats in Congress were united in support of reform, they were divided about what form it should take, with some insisting that the federal government offer a “public-option” coverage plan and others urging that private coverage be extended to those who lacked it. More than three-fourths of Americans had private health insurance in some form, and despite the steeply rising costs of health care, many of them worried that changing the system might make their own situation worse, as well as adding to the federal budget deficit that the Recovery Act had already sent soaring to more than $1 trillion per year.

In the face of these obstacles, Obama resolved that any reform proposal would have to be budget-neutral—that is, save as much money as it spent. He accommodated the interests of the pharmaceutical and hospital industries, both of which had helped to sink President Clinton’s health care bill through massive advertising and extensive lobbying. He invited Congress to share in developing the bill, in contrast to the secret process of legislative formulation that Clinton had employed.

These efforts alone were not enough to secure passage, especially when members of Congress encountered angry opposition to “Obamacare” from the newly formed, grassroots conservative Tea Party movement in a series of August 2009 town-hall meetings in their home states and districts. The President, frustrated that he was not getting through to the American people, decided to speak to the nation in a prime-time address to Congress on September 9, 2009.

“The plan I’m announcing tonight would meet three basic goals,” Obama declared. “It will provide more security and stability to those who have health insurance. It will provide insurance to those who don’t. And it will slow the growth of health care costs for our families, our businesses, and our government.” Specifically, “individuals will be required to carry basic health insurance—just as most states require you to carry auto insurance. Likewise, businesses will be required to either offer their workers health care, or chip in to help cover the costs of their workers.”

Image 

Obama’s argument was overshadowed to some degree when, in response to his declaration that the “claim . . . that our reform effort will insure illegal immigrants . . . is false,” Republican representative Joe Wilson of South Carolina shouted, “You lie!” from his seat in the House chamber. But the speech succeeded in arresting the months-long decline in public and congressional support for reform. In this altered political environment, the President launched a successful campaign to persuade members of Congress in face-to-face meetings. By year’s end, both houses of Congress had passed different versions of health care reform legislation. On March 23, 2010, after some elaborate legislative wrangling to get the House to pass the Senate bill, Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law. One week later he signed the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, which restored some of the House’s preferred features.

Affordable Care Act Exposed

In government class this year we have learned how to take complex information regarding bills and laws and break down the information to fully understand exactly what the bill and or law is proposing to do. There has been a lot of controversy regarding whether the Affordable Care Act will be helpful to the American people or not. One of the biggest issues of the bill is that the American people do not actually know what the bill consists of.

As of right now most Americans have not felt the effects of any changes as stated in an article from USA Today that “2 in threeAmericans have not been affected by the law yet. Only 14% said they have benefited; 21% said they have been affected negatively.” As I breakdown the ins and outs of the bill, you will find that it does not serve the best interest of the American people.

If the bill is confirmed in the Supreme Court this June, some changes that will happen this year according to MSNBC are, dependent children under the age of 26 can remain on their parents insurance plan, senior citizens will get more financial aid for the purchase of their medications, everyone will be able to buy insurance even if they have pre-existing conditions or were uninsurable in the past, and small businesses with less than 25 employees and $50,000 average salary will qualify for up to a 35% tax cut off of their premiums. The long-term effects that will begin in 2014 according to USA Today are:  insurance exchanges which will allow people not insured by their employer to have options for insurance plans, everyone will be required to have insurance or will pay a fine of $695, insurance companies cannot impose annual limits on essential benefits, Medicaid programs will be available for individuals making less than $15,000 and families $30,700, and tax credits will be given to people with incomes less than $44,680 for individuals and $92,200 for a family of 4.

What do all these changes mean for the American people? For an individual and family looking at the law, it could mean several things: having to pay a fine if not insured, having their insurance discontinued because their employer dropped coverage due to skyrocketing costs of insurance plans for employees, and having a decrease in care for the same policy. The positive side of the bill is that it could help by allowing people to extend their child’s insurance on their own policy until the age of 26. The impact for small business owners (less than 49 employees) is mainly beneficial because of tax credits, but is not mandated to pay for employees’ healthcare.  The larger businesses are the ones penalized by having to offer minimal healthcare to employees or having to pay a monthly penalty based on “the number of its full-time employees, less 30, multiplied by $166.67,” according to Health Law Monitor.  With the adverse effects of the healthcare bill on large businesses, you could see a decrease in full-time employees and an increase in part-time employees because the business owners are going to try to make the same amount of profit regardless of whether the owners have to cut jobs or employ more part-time employees.  Also, the impact on the quality of medical care would decrease based on healthcareitnews.com. According to a NPS (Net Promoter Score) survey done on the future of healthcare, 65% of the doctors fear the quality of care of patients will decrease.  Many doctors said they will retire early because they will not be making adequate money for all the risks they take, and doctors are concerned about the privacy and security issues for patients as well.

 

The Affordable Care Act bill may in the short term help the citizens of the United States, but in the long term will have serious repercussions and drawbacks for all classes.  From the business and economic standpoint, the bill will hurt businesses, making it harder for the owners to net the same profit, which will in turn affect how many jobs are offered by the businesses and the jobs that are available will, more than likely, be part-time jobs.  The bill could be helpful on some levels; but as a whole, will not have a positive impact on the American people or the healthcare of the United States.

 

 

Presidential Power: Is it saving lives?

    Arriving home each day from school to TV shows like Rachel Maddow Show and The Colbert Report had never really interested me before taking 11th grade government. I now find myself sitting down with my family and taking the time to watch these shows and I have finally realized that I truly understand what these popular Television faces are discussing. One of the main topics that I have been seeing discussed on national television is obviously the 2012 Election. And although I am just short of being old enough to vote in it, I feel as if I may be more qualified than many adults to take part in this election all thanks to my Government class. Opinions on taxes, war, healthcare, and marriage rights are all very crucial during this election but the topics of healthcare and gay rights stand out to me most.

    I will not be able to participate in the upcoming election by voting, but I do believe that I can still make an impact by voicing my opinions. I am very passionate about the issue on Same-Sex marriage and take every opportunity I get to express my beliefs. By taking this course I have learned so much about how the election process works, I was able to understand the Primary and Caucus systems which have now lead into the process of gaining delegates. Using interactive websites during class helped me learn the material in an interesting way.

    Presidential power was a topic we discussed that really impacted me. Presidents should be able to make changes and not be limited by documents written over 200 years ago. Franklin Delano Roosevelt first began thinking this way. His modern way of thinking was to benefit America in the times of change and while technology was growing. Now moving into the 21st century, times have changed since the Constitution was written. America is not the same today and in order to make changes, the President needs to be able to stray from the norms in the 1800s and make decisions that benefit America today in the 2000s. While the Constitution is a very important document and should always remain the center of thinking for our government, a new point of view on it and a little more elbow room in the interpretation should be able to take place in order to help America grow.

Image

    For Barack Obama, this elbow room in power took place in his healthcare system. While it wasn’t the most popular and still is not today, he did not overstep his constitutional rights but still took control in shaping America how he saw most fit. Today, his policy is helping American’s tremendously. Sahil Kapur from TPM points out that Obamacare has saved senior citizens 3.4 billion dollars in their prescription drug costs. During this time of technological advances where medical advances are being made at high costs, the President was able to use his power to help citizens obtain these live saving and prolonging goods.

       Obama’s healthcare will give back $1.3 billion to American’s and companies giving back to the economy says The LA Times. Obama’s healthcare system helps relieve the cost of hospital and medical fees by spreading the cost of insurance more equally between all Americans. Elise Viebeck of The Hill Online explains how because of his new laws over 200 local clinics have been updated with more modern equipment and up to 1.3 million American’s will be able to use local healthcare to its fullest.